Author summary
4% 1 analyzed article/video 1,354 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrea Pineda-Salgado results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Loss Aversion , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 268 hits . Analysis detected 1,105 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 12% (8,006 of 9,092 authors). This Andrea Pineda-Salgado is better (less manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group. Andrea Pineda-Salgado
Author details
Total words: 5,416
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.9% percentile 1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.0% 5.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst