Author summary
56%2 analyzed articles/videos1,277 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aidan Stretch results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 401 hits. Analysis detected 2,853 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,616 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 35% (5,624 of 8,558 authors). This Aidan Stretch is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group.
Aidan Stretch
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
35%Aidan Stretch (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,616
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

34% percentile
025507510034.3% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.6%6.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos