Commentary: Tarik Skubal trade brings Dodgers hate, envy ... and another championship 65%

By Bill Plaschke99%

8/1/2026, 8:58:21 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 34 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 24.1% saturation with 190 hits. Analysis detected 1,528 faulty-reasoning hits from 787 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.4% and a BS Rank of 65% (10,352 of 29,339 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 64.70% of the article peer group.

Tarik Skubal is a Dodger. 
The five words every baseball soul outside of Los Angeles dreaded hearing. 
The Dodgers are going to three-peat. 
The six words that every baseball soul everywhere must now acknowledge. 
It’s over. 
The chase for baseball’s best pitcher, the hunt by baseball’s best team, the pennant race, the World Series, all of it. 
It’s over. 
The Dodgers just stole it all again, three months early but right on time, their third consecutive championship cemented when they traded for the Detroit Tigers’ Tarik Skubal, the two-time defending American League Cy Young Award winner and quite simply the best pitcher in baseball. 
Everybody wanted him. 
The Dodgers were the only team with enough assets to get him. 
Of course they were. 
They always are. 
And in return, they surely will win a third consecutive championship against a withering and overmatched group of pretenders that could add Skubal only in their dreams. 
He cost the Dodgers top prospects Zyhir Hope, River Ryan and Brady Smith. 
So? 
The Dodgers have tons of them. 
He could be a free agent this winter and may cost $400 million to retain. 
So? 
The Dodgers have that much in their couch cushions. 
The Dodgers’ injury-scarred rotation needed a stud starting pitcher like Skubal and, as this column noted last month, there was no excuse for baseball’s wealthiest and smartest team not to grab him. 
So the Dodgers grabbed him. 
Of course they did. 
They are rushing full bore toward that three-peat and, to the delight of the most appreciative fans in baseball, nothing is going to get in their way. 
The rest of baseball will hate them for this. 
They don’t care. 
Critics will say this is yet another example of how they are ruining the game. 
They could give a rip. 
A move like this  the insanely rich getting insanely richer  could be cited this winter as a reason for the game shutting down over a labor dispute. 
Not their problem. 
With a sore Shohei Ohtani looking increasingly doubtful for a meaningful October on the mound, with Blake Snell and Tyler Glasnow still sidelined because of injuries, Skubal can slide into the No. 2 spot in a rotation that, if everyone gets healthy, could wind up being the best in baseball history. 
Of course, in the immortal words of Kobe Bryant, the job is not finished. 
There are still questions, even for a team that has all the answers. 
Skubal is a tremendous postseason pitcher, with a 2.04 ERA in six starts, but will his surgically repaired left elbow survive through his third postseason? 
After pushing 200 innings the last two seasons, he underwent a newfangled minimally invasive procedure on May 6 to remove a loose body from his elbow. 
Recovery time for a similar surgery performed the old-fashioned way is two to three months, but he was back on the mound in a game just a month later. 
Will this new operation hold up? 
Time will tell, but the Dodgers will be holding their breath. 
After Yoshinobu Yamamoto and Skubal, the Dodgers have another potentially big question. 
What do they do about Ohtani? 
He’s got a balky knee, and now a painful biceps, and the Dodgers have kept him off the mound for a moment, but what happens in October? 
By acquiring Skubal, the Dodgers can afford to pull Ohtani out of the rotation altogether and allow him to focus on hitting, which has taken a bit of a hit with the pitching issues. 
But would he accept such a move, which might feel like a demotion? 
Ohtani always has put winning first, but he also began the season openly acknowledging his quest for a Cy Young Award. 
So there’s that. 
Rounding out the rotation, the Dodgers still will need some good fortune to round out the rotation. 
They say Snell and Glasnow are both on the verge of returning from what has essentially been season-long injuries. 
But they’ll both be 33 in October, so believe only what you see. 
Roki Sasaki has been tremendous since the All-Star break  that new glove has been a giant success  but he’s still never started a postseason game. 
And for all his surprise greatness this summer, Justin Wrobleski also has yet to start a postseason game. 
It all could get interesting. 
But it shouldn’t be suspenseful. 
Skubal solves all mysteries. 
Skubal ends all arguments. 
Skubal saves the summer. 
The Dodgers are the most championship-driven and fan-devoted team in all of sports. 
They will do whatever it takes, however it takes, whenever it takes, to win. 
Five words that unequivocally prove it. 
<i>Tarik Skubal is a Dodger.</i> 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 13.5%Bill Plaschke: 5.3%Daily Pilot: 2.8%Confirmation Bias13.5%This article: 1.9%Bill Plaschke: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 1.1%Anchoring Bias1.9%This article: 5.6%Bill Plaschke: 2.1%Daily Pilot: 3.3%Availability Heuristic5.6%This article: 1.7%Bill Plaschke: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic1.7%This article: 5.7%Bill Plaschke: 2.6%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Hindsight Bias5.7%This article: 9.0%Bill Plaschke: 8.4%Daily Pilot: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias9.0%This article: 3.7%Bill Plaschke: 2.0%Daily Pilot: 6.8%Framing Effect3.7%This article: 0.0%Bill Plaschke: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Plaschke: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.8%Bill Plaschke: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.8%This article: 24.1%Bill Plaschke: 11.4%Daily Pilot: 3.3%Optimism Bias24.1%This article: 10.0%Bill Plaschke: 2.4%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Pessimism Bias10.0%This article: 11.6%Bill Plaschke: 5.9%Daily Pilot: 7.4%Negativity Bias11.6%This article: 0.8%Bill Plaschke: 1.4%Daily Pilot: 2.1%Self-Serving Bias0.8%This article: 0.0%Bill Plaschke: 2.3%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Plaschke: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Bill Plaschke: 3.5%Daily Pilot: 1.5%In-Group Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Bill Plaschke: 1.2%Daily Pilot: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Bill Plaschke: 15.6%Daily Pilot: 4.6%Halo Effect6.7%This article: 0.0%Bill Plaschke: 2.5%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Plaschke: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.9%Bill Plaschke: 2.0%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias6.9%This article: 0.6%Bill Plaschke: 1.9%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.6%This article: 0.0%Bill Plaschke: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Plaschke: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 3.4%Bill Plaschke: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Straw Man3.4%This article: 5.8%Bill Plaschke: 3.3%Daily Pilot: 4.5%Appeal to Authority5.8%This article: 7.0%Bill Plaschke: 1.7%Daily Pilot: 1.1%False Dilemma7.0%This article: 3.7%Bill Plaschke: 2.4%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope3.7%This article: 2.4%Bill Plaschke: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning2.4%This article: 9.1%Bill Plaschke: 7.9%Daily Pilot: 4.1%Hasty Generalization9.1%This article: 0.0%Bill Plaschke: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.4%Bill Plaschke: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Bandwagon3.4%This article: 5.7%Bill Plaschke: 5.7%Daily Pilot: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion5.7%This article: 5.5%Bill Plaschke: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question5.5%This article: 0.0%Bill Plaschke: 4.9%Daily Pilot: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.6%Bill Plaschke: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.6%This article: 0.0%Bill Plaschke: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 1.7%Bill Plaschke: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature1.7%This article: 0.0%Bill Plaschke: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 16.6%Bill Plaschke: 2.4%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Anecdotal16.6%This article: 0.4%Bill Plaschke: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.4%This article: 0.0%Bill Plaschke: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Plaschke: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Plaschke: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Plaschke: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 1.1%Bill Plaschke: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading1.1%This article: 0.0%Bill Plaschke: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.3%Bill Plaschke: 1.2%Daily Pilot: 1.2%Unattributed Quote4.3%This article: 0.6%Bill Plaschke: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.6%This article: 13.5%Bill Plaschke: 44.0%Daily Pilot: 5.6%Biased Writer Voice13.5%This article: 1.5%Bill Plaschke: 2.9%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Indoctrination1.5%This article: 0.0%Bill Plaschke: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Plaschke: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bill Plaschke: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

787 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker1.8%attributed speech773writer words
Selected voice

Kobe Bryant

100%flagged-word coverage
14 attributed words100% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-13.7 ptsWriter: 13.7%Kobe Bryant: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-4.4 ptsWriter: 4.4%Kobe Bryant: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-1.6 ptsWriter: 1.6%Kobe Bryant: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-0.6 ptsWriter: 0.6%Kobe Bryant: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.