Keyword summary
82% 1 analyzed article/video 787 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pitcher results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 556 hits . Analysis detected 3,834 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 69% (17,946 of 56,758 keywords). This Pitcher is worse (more manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group. Pitcher
Keyword details
Total words: 3,148
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.4% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 17.7% 17.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.3% 17.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst