Keyword summary
32% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,818 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justin Wrobleski results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 583 hits . Analysis detected 4,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,272 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 20% (45,603 of 56,794 keywords). This Justin Wrobleski is better (less manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group. Justin Wrobleski
Keyword details
Total words: 7,272
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.7% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst