Keyword summary
0% 22 analyzed articles/videos 2,107 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Series results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Halo Effect , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 61.4% saturation with 3,879 hits . Analysis detected 21,772 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,321 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.8% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,459 of 35,718 keywords). This World Series is worse (more manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group. World Series
Keyword details
Total words: 6,321
Article count: 22
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.1% percentile 8.8% BS Score22 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 61.4% 61.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 48.2% 48.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 34.1% 34.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 30.1% 30.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 30.6% 30.6% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 23.2% 23.2% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 22.7% 22.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 15.6% 15.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Keyword 61.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 48.2%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 34.1%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 30.6%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 30.1%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 23.2%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 22.7%, sitewide 2.5% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% No True Scotsman: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst