Dodgers 9x World Series Champions Legacy Bronze Coin Photo Mints⁠96%

11/3/2025, 10:16:17 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Loss Aversion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 274 faulty-reasoning hits from 82 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 93.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (857 of 21,197 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 96.00% of the article peer group.

A Limited Edition to celebrate the LA Dodgers' World Series Championships! 
This 12" x 20" frame comes with double matting, a plexiglass front panel, a custom and individually numbered 15" x 7" print featuring each of their World Series victories, and a minted 39mm solid bronze Championship commemorative coin. 
Limited to only 5000 editions, each frame includes a certificate of authenticity. 
This item is officially licensed by the MLB and proudly made in the USA. 
Please note this item is final sale. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 61.0%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Anchoring Bias61.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 100.0%Daily Pilot: 7.5%Framing Effect100.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 17.1%Daily Pilot: 5.1%Halo Effect17.1%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 30.5%Daily Pilot: 1.7%In-Group Bias30.5%This article: 36.6%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Loss Aversion36.6%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 7.7%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 13.4%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Optimism Bias13.4%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 31.7%Daily Pilot: 4.9%Appeal to Authority31.7%This article: 30.5%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion30.5%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 13.4%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Bandwagon13.4%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 4.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%

82 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.