Topic summary
ā 59%2 analyzed articles/videos1,729 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tarik Skubal Trade results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and In-Group Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 826 hits. Analysis detected 5,455 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,916 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ā 32% (16,082 of 23,563 topics). This Tarik Skubal Trade is better (less manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group.
Tarik Skubal Trade
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,916
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510031.8% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 11.9%11.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos