OutKick⁠97%

Buff Florida Fan Becomes Buff Nebraska Fan, Goes 0-For-2 In March Madness ⁠85%

By Austin Perry⁠0%

3/27/2026, 2:20:33 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 30 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 64.2% saturation with 276 hits. Analysis detected 1,448 faulty-reasoning hits from 430 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 76.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (3,297 of 21,176 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 84.40% of the article peer group.

Do you guys remember "Buff Florida Fan?" 
I think it's safe to say we all know Buff Florida Fan at this point, and how could you not? 
The man with the jet black hair, medium Gators jersey, and biceps that looked like SpongeBob's inflatable arms was plastered all over our TV screens during Florida's first and second round games of the NCAA Tournament in Tampa. 
The announcers couldn't get enough of him. 
The internet couldn't get enough of him. 
Hell, I even wrote an entire article about him this past weekend. 
Then he took some pictures with 7'9" Gators center, Olivier Rioux, and poof, he was gone. 
Or was he? 
It turns out, Buff Florida Fan had some extra time on his hands and a couple plane tickets to Houston, because he showed up to Nebraska and Iowa's Sweet 16 matchup in Space City. 
But he didn't just go as a neutral observer. 
Oh, no! 
It would appear Buff Florida Fan is now Buff Nebraska Fan (complete with the same size medium tank). 
I feel like I've been stabbed in the heart! 
As Paulie Walnuts would say, "How much more betrayal can I take?" 
I thought this man was ride or die with the Gators. 
What in the hell is he doing wearing a Cornhuskers jersey? 
As many have pointed out, this was likely a hate-watch for our pumped-up hoop-head, as you'll note the camouflage Gators hat still present on top of his head. 
He was just rooting for the team that sent his boys home early this tournament. 
But I have to be honest with you, even if I was there to hate watch another team, I'd either go in neutral colors or just wear my Gator gear. 
It actually looks like Buff Basketball Fan originally planned on that, showing up in all black before donning the Nebraska jersey. 
I couldn't stomach putting on another team's jersey to root against the ones who knocked my team out. 
Some would call that "beta mentality," but I doubt anyone has ever said that to this guy's face, so I think I'll plead the fifth and pass on that one. 
One thing is for sure, though. 
This guy cannot watch any more Florida basketball games in person. 
He is 0-for-2 when it comes to teams he's rooting for in the tournament, and he might be cursed, given how disastrous the end of that Iowa-Nebraska game was. 
I better see some signs up on the doors of Exactech Arena! 
No entry! 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 17.7%Austin Perry: 10.4%Outkick: 8.8%Confirmation Bias17.7%This article: 2.6%Austin Perry: 3.4%Outkick: 1.9%Anchoring Bias2.6%This article: 23.7%Austin Perry: 8.8%Outkick: 5.3%Availability Heuristic23.7%This article: 4.2%Austin Perry: 2.5%Outkick: 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic4.2%This article: 19.5%Austin Perry: 1.1%Outkick: 1.9%Hindsight Bias19.5%This article: 1.4%Austin Perry: 5.2%Outkick: 6.1%Overconfidence Bias1.4%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 14.6%Outkick: 12.5%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 2.1%Outkick: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 2.6%Outkick: 1.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 0.2%Outkick: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 7.2%Outkick: 4.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%Austin Perry: 3.4%Outkick: 2.5%Pessimism Bias9.3%This article: 13.7%Austin Perry: 17.1%Outkick: 12.8%Negativity Bias13.7%This article: 9.8%Austin Perry: 4.4%Outkick: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias9.8%This article: 11.4%Austin Perry: 5.4%Outkick: 3.2%Fundamental Attribution Error11.4%This article: 7.0%Austin Perry: 0.8%Outkick: 0.6%Actor-Observer Bias7.0%This article: 7.0%Austin Perry: 11.6%Outkick: 5.1%In-Group Bias7.0%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 5.5%Outkick: 2.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Austin Perry: 5.6%Outkick: 5.2%Halo Effect1.6%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 2.5%Outkick: 1.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 0.0%Outkick: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 5.4%Outkick: 3.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Austin Perry: 0.4%Outkick: 0.5%Primacy Effect4.7%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 0.8%Outkick: 0.4%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Austin Perry: 5.7%Outkick: 4.0%Ad Hominem2.6%This article: 7.0%Austin Perry: 2.4%Outkick: 2.0%Straw Man7.0%This article: 2.8%Austin Perry: 3.7%Outkick: 3.6%Appeal to Authority2.8%This article: 5.6%Austin Perry: 3.2%Outkick: 2.3%False Dilemma5.6%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 2.3%Outkick: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 0.1%Outkick: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.8%Austin Perry: 19.1%Outkick: 11.5%Hasty Generalization8.8%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 2.4%Outkick: 1.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 6.5%Austin Perry: 4.6%Outkick: 2.4%Bandwagon6.5%This article: 15.3%Austin Perry: 16.4%Outkick: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion15.3%This article: 0.7%Austin Perry: 2.7%Outkick: 1.7%Begging the Question0.7%This article: 24.4%Austin Perry: 2.5%Outkick: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)24.4%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 0.2%Outkick: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 0.4%Outkick: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 0.1%Outkick: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 0.6%Outkick: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 20.9%Austin Perry: 10.4%Outkick: 4.3%Anecdotal20.9%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 1.0%Outkick: 0.4%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.2%Austin Perry: 1.0%Outkick: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.2%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 0.0%Outkick: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 0.7%Outkick: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 11.2%Austin Perry: 1.0%Outkick: 0.7%Personal Incredulity11.2%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 1.6%Outkick: 1.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 1.5%Outkick: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 19.5%Austin Perry: 1.4%Outkick: 2.1%Unattributed Quote19.5%This article: 2.8%Austin Perry: 0.7%Outkick: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection2.8%This article: 64.2%Austin Perry: 24.1%Outkick: 18.0%Biased Writer Voice64.2%This article: 6.7%Austin Perry: 4.3%Outkick: 2.4%Indoctrination6.7%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 0.0%Outkick: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 2.3%Outkick: 2.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Austin Perry: 2.5%Outkick: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

430 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker2.8%attributed speech418writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coveragePaulie Walnuts • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Paulie Walnuts

100%flagged-word coverage
12 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Paulie Walnuts: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+82.8 ptsWriter: 17.2%Paulie Walnuts: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-66.0 ptsWriter: 66.0%Paulie Walnuts: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-6.9 ptsWriter: 6.9%Paulie Walnuts: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.