Keyword summary
0% 14 analyzed articles/videos 10,555 analyzed words
BS Summary: These College Basketball results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 6,703 hits . Analysis detected 44,905 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,439 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (23,001 of 37,536 keywords). This College Basketball is better (less manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group. College Basketball
Keyword details
Total words: 35,439
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score14 analyzed articles35.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.9% 18.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst