Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video430 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sweet 16 results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 41.9% saturation with 721 hits. Analysis detected 2,851 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (3,766 of 16,244 topics). This Sweet 16 is worse (more manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Sweet 16
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,720
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510076.8% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 41.9%41.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 41.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.2%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Bandwagon: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos