Keyword summary
0% 13 analyzed articles/videos 8,352 analyzed words
BS Summary: These March Madness results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 4,654 hits . Analysis detected 28,848 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,317 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 30% (25,134 of 35,718 keywords). This March Madness is better (less manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group. March Madness
Keyword details
Total words: 26,317
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.6% percentile 2.1% BS Score13 analyzed articles26.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.7% 17.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst