Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,226 analyzed words
BS Summary: These EDDIE PELLS results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 604 hits . Analysis detected 5,780 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,565 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,539 of 6,469 authors). This EDDIE PELLS is worse (more manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group. EDDIE PELLS
Author details
Total words: 5,565
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.8% percentile 3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.8% 2.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 8.2% 8.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.0% 10.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.0%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 4.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Composition/Division: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst