Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 430 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nebraska Cornhuskers results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 41.9% saturation with 721 hits . Analysis detected 2,851 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,954 of 37,530 keywords). This Nebraska Cornhuskers is worse (more manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group. Nebraska Cornhuskers
Keyword details
Total words: 1,720
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.5% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 41.9% 41.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 41.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst