Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 892 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iowa Hawkeyes results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 44.6% saturation with 1,384 hits . Analysis detected 4,323 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,106 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,616 of 37,536 keywords). This Iowa Hawkeyes is worse (more manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group. Iowa Hawkeyes
Keyword details
Total words: 3,106
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.7% percentile 4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 44.6% 44.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 44.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst