Mediaite70%

Fox’s Laura Ingraham Says Iran’s Air Force One Threat Undercuts Trump’s War Claims: We ‘Obviously’ Didn’t ‘Decimate’ Their Military 65%

By Kathryn Wilkens41%

7/25/2026, 12:46:30 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 73 hits. Analysis detected 606 faulty-reasoning hits from 357 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 59.5% and a BS Rank of 65% (7,659 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 65.00% of the article peer group.

Fox News’ Laura Ingraham said Friday that reporting detailing how an Iranian threat forced President Donald Trump not to use his gifted Qatari jet undercuts his claims on the war in the region, declaring, “We didn’t decimate their military capabilities, obviously.” 
While speculation of security concerns has been spreading since early July over the reasoning behind Trump’s switch back to the original Air Force One for his journey home from the NATO Summit in Turkey, The New York Times reported Friday, per multiple people briefed on the matter, that officials deemed there was “a credible threat that Iranian proxy forces were targeting him and Air Force One.” 
At the time, Trump claimed the switch was because he wanted to allow American troops in Britain to see the $400 million Qatari gift. 
“So, if Iran can credibly threaten Air Force One overseas,” said Ingraham on The Ingraham Angle Friday, “we didn’t decimate their military capabilities, obviously. 
They are still capable of a lot of harm.” 
Here, Ingraham is referring to claims by the president, which he’s made multiple times throughout the conflict, that Iran has been “decimated for a 10-year period.” 
The war in Iran began Feb. 
28. 
A tentative ceasefire was reached in April, and then broken in June. 
A memorandum of understanding was reached later in June, and consequently also broken. 
Since then, the U.S. and Iran have continued to exchange deadly military strikes, with four American service members killed just this past weekend. 
As for the Times  reporting on the matter, on Thursday, the Department of Justice withdrew subpoenas seeking phone records and grand jury testimony from three reporters who assisted in covering the initial speculation over the plane switch. 
Federal Judge Arun Subramanian sharply criticized the government’s handling of the case and indicated he would quash the subpoenas, questioning whether prosecutors had even followed the legal standards for subpoenaing journalists. 
On Friday, Trump maintained that the subpoenas were strictly meant to find the “leakers” responsible. 
Watch the clip of Ingraham above via Fox News. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 18.2%Kathryn Wilkens: 4.2%Mediaite: 5.0%Confirmation Bias18.2%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.8%Mediaite: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 18.5%Kathryn Wilkens: 4.7%Mediaite: 3.8%Availability Heuristic18.5%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.9%Mediaite: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.2%Mediaite: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Kathryn Wilkens: 3.3%Mediaite: 2.1%Overconfidence Bias2.5%This article: 12.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 8.9%Mediaite: 9.1%Framing Effect12.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.4%Mediaite: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 10.6%Kathryn Wilkens: 1.0%Mediaite: 0.4%Status Quo Bias10.6%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.3%Mediaite: 1.2%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Kathryn Wilkens: 2.9%Mediaite: 1.6%Pessimism Bias2.5%This article: 20.4%Kathryn Wilkens: 11.8%Mediaite: 14.7%Negativity Bias20.4%This article: 10.9%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.9%Mediaite: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias10.9%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 1.2%Mediaite: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 1.6%Mediaite: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 1.8%Mediaite: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.1%Mediaite: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.4%Mediaite: 0.7%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.4%Kathryn Wilkens: 1.8%Mediaite: 2.3%Recency Bias6.4%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 1.4%Mediaite: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.2%Mediaite: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.5%Mediaite: 3.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.1%Mediaite: 1.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.7%Kathryn Wilkens: 5.2%Mediaite: 3.5%Appeal to Authority8.7%This article: 6.7%Kathryn Wilkens: 2.2%Mediaite: 2.4%False Dilemma6.7%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.6%Mediaite: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.3%Mediaite: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 9.5%Mediaite: 7.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 10.6%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.6%Mediaite: 0.4%Red Herring10.6%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.3%Mediaite: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 5.3%Mediaite: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 11.5%Kathryn Wilkens: 1.3%Mediaite: 1.6%Begging the Question11.5%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 2.3%Mediaite: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.2%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.9%Mediaite: 1.2%Burden of Proof4.2%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.3%Mediaite: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.3%Mediaite: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.5%Kathryn Wilkens: 2.0%Mediaite: 3.0%Anecdotal2.5%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.7%Kathryn Wilkens: 3.0%Mediaite: 2.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.7%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.5%Mediaite: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.0%Mediaite: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 4.2%Mediaite: 3.3%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 6.7%Kathryn Wilkens: 4.5%Mediaite: 3.2%Quote-first Misdirection6.7%This article: 7.3%Kathryn Wilkens: 3.5%Mediaite: 8.3%Biased Writer Voice7.3%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 1.6%Mediaite: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.9%Mediaite: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.2%Mediaite: 1.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Kathryn Wilkens: 0.6%Mediaite: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.5%

357 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers43%attributed speech204writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageLaura Ingraham • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 66 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 24 words • 0.0% coverageLaura Ingraham • 24 words • 100.0% coverageLaura Ingraham • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageArun Subramanian • 31 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 15 words • 0.0% coverageFox News • 9 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Laura Ingraham

100%flagged-word coverage
74 attributed words48% of attributed speech84% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Quote-first Misdirection+32.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Laura Ingraham: 32.4%32.4%Biased Writer Voice-12.7 ptsWriter: 12.7%Laura Ingraham: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.