Keyword summary
96% 3 analyzed articles/videos 224 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Ingraham results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 509 hits . Analysis detected 5,258 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,988 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,920 of 37,536 keywords). This Laura Ingraham is worse (more manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group. Laura Ingraham
Keyword details
Total words: 2,988
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.2% percentile 4.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 15.7% 15.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.8% 15.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Red Herring: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst