Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Presidential Claims results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 356 hits. Analysis detected 3,944 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,933 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Claims is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Presidential Claims
Topic details
Total words: 3,933
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 3.8%3.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos