BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Representativeness Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 30.5% saturation with 182 hits. Analysis detected 1,176 faulty-reasoning hits from 596 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46% and a BS Rank of 55% (12,715 of 27,714 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 54.10% of the article peer group.

After former State Senate President Troy Jackson won the vast majority of delegates in county meetings over the weekend, his rivals for the Democratic U.S. 
Senate nomination dropped out of the race, leaving his path clear to face off against Sen. 
Susan Collins in November. 
The winner-take-all process for selecting delegates by county favored the superior grassroots organization of the Jackson campaign—his slates of delegates swept county after county over the weekend, with only a few delegate spots going to supporters of other candidates or non-aligned delegates. 
By the end of the first round of county meetings on Saturday, Jackson had already won enough support to claim more than 301 delegates, enough to be elected on the first ballot at a party convention scheduled for this coming Saturday, July 25. 
By the end of the contests on Sunday, Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, former public health director Nirav Shah, Maine Beer Company owner Dan Kleban, and former congressional aide Jordan Wood had all exited the race. 
“I’m grateful to every volunteer who worked around the clock for this movement,” said Bellows in a statement. 
“That energy is exactly what we need to beat Susan Collins in November  and Democrats don’t have a day to waste in unifying around that shared goal.” 
Jackson delegates at the Kennebec County caucus | Jackson official campaign photo 
Jackson’s strength was obvious early in the process. 
Sentiments on social media ran heavily in his favor before the votes were cast, with many Maine Democrats pointing to him as closely aligned with former Democratic nominee Graham Platner and the obvious successor to his progressive movement. 
Jackson was also heavily favored in the statements delegate candidates submitted to the state party, with many who weren’t listed on his eventual slate also publicly declaring their support for the former logger from Allagash. 
His campaign was the first to announce a slate, with a full count of delegate candidates for nearly every county. 
Jackson asked his supporters to only vote for the candidates on his list and no others, which maximized the votes for each of his candidates. 
With this strategy, Jackson’s campaign was able to elect almost all of their slate as delegates, leaving the non-voting alternates at each meeting to be elected by their competitors. 
The other campaigns sent out smaller slates later in the process, with some of the delegate candidates they listed featured on multiple slates or not having pledged to support any candidate. 
Combined, Jackson’s rivals elected only around 20 delegates out of the 500 selected over the weekend. 
The biggest factor in Jackson’s victory may have been the decision made by Democratic Party leaders shortly after Platner exited the race to open up the contest beyond the 101 members of the State Committee and elect an additional 500 delegates through the county-level caucus system to select a new nominee. 
Jackson’s volunteers, who had just honed their skills over a year-long race for governor, could turn their attention to a contest where organizing muscle obviously made a greater difference than in the statewide gubernatorial primary. 
It’s not yet clear what the nominating convention on Saturday will look like now that all other qualified candidates have dropped out, but if it goes forward, it will be more of a coronation than a contest. 
“Our campaign has always been powered by ordinary Mainers  not corporate PACs or wealthy special interests, but neighbors organizing neighbors because they believe we deserve better,” said Jackson on Monday morning. 
“In November, we are going to defeat Susan Collins and reclaim our Senate.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.9%Beacon Staff: 5.4%Maine Beacon: 5.6%Confirmation Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.7%Maine Beacon: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Beacon Staff: 3.0%Maine Beacon: 3.2%Availability Heuristic6.4%This article: 19.3%Beacon Staff: 1.1%Maine Beacon: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic19.3%This article: 4.2%Beacon Staff: 0.6%Maine Beacon: 1.0%Hindsight Bias4.2%This article: 8.6%Beacon Staff: 1.5%Maine Beacon: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias8.6%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 9.4%Maine Beacon: 9.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.3%Maine Beacon: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.4%Maine Beacon: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.9%Beacon Staff: 3.4%Maine Beacon: 2.5%Optimism Bias6.9%This article: 6.2%Beacon Staff: 1.6%Maine Beacon: 1.6%Pessimism Bias6.2%This article: 5.4%Beacon Staff: 9.2%Maine Beacon: 10.2%Negativity Bias5.4%This article: 12.9%Beacon Staff: 0.9%Maine Beacon: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias12.9%This article: 4.2%Beacon Staff: 0.4%Maine Beacon: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error4.2%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.1%Maine Beacon: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Beacon Staff: 3.8%Maine Beacon: 4.1%In-Group Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.3%Maine Beacon: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Beacon Staff: 0.6%Maine Beacon: 1.7%Halo Effect7.2%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.4%Maine Beacon: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 2.0%Maine Beacon: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.8%Maine Beacon: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 2.9%Maine Beacon: 2.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.8%Maine Beacon: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 1.9%Maine Beacon: 2.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 20.1%Beacon Staff: 3.5%Maine Beacon: 2.7%False Dilemma20.1%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.9%Maine Beacon: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.2%Maine Beacon: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 5.3%Maine Beacon: 6.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.1%Maine Beacon: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 2.1%Maine Beacon: 1.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.1%Beacon Staff: 13.7%Maine Beacon: 13.1%Appeal to Emotion10.1%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.7%Maine Beacon: 1.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 30.5%Beacon Staff: 3.5%Maine Beacon: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)30.5%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.7%Maine Beacon: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.3%Maine Beacon: 0.5%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.4%Beacon Staff: 2.5%Maine Beacon: 3.3%Anecdotal6.4%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.4%Maine Beacon: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.1%Maine Beacon: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.0%Maine Beacon: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 1.1%Maine Beacon: 1.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.2%Beacon Staff: 0.2%Maine Beacon: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection2.2%This article: 14.3%Beacon Staff: 2.8%Maine Beacon: 7.9%Biased Writer Voice14.3%This article: 10.1%Beacon Staff: 6.2%Maine Beacon: 5.9%Indoctrination10.1%This article: 12.2%Beacon Staff: 9.3%Maine Beacon: 10.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias12.2%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.3%Maine Beacon: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Beacon Staff: 0.8%Maine Beacon: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

596 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers15%attributed speech505writer words
Selected voice

Jackson

100%flagged-word coverage
45 attributed words49% of attributed speech64% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning B+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jackson: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination+71.1 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jackson: 71.1%71.1%Quote-first Misdirection+28.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jackson: 28.9%28.9%Biased Writer Voice-16.8 ptsWriter: 16.8%Jackson: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.