Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,428 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nominating Convention results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 530 hits . Analysis detected 5,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,736 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (27,072 of 37,536 keywords). This Nominating Convention is better (less manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group. Nominating Convention
Keyword details
Total words: 6,736
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst