Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video873 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Party Nominations results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 792 hits. Analysis detected 3,290 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,492 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (8,363 of 16,559 topics). This Party Nominations is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group.
Party Nominations
Topic details
Total words: 3,492
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510049.5% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 22.7%22.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 22.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos