MinnPost36%

It’s official: The dormant prison in rural Appleton will become an ICE detention center 12%

By Brian Arola62% Ana Radelat61%

8/4/2026, 8:56:07 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 112 hits. Analysis detected 947 faulty-reasoning hits from 845 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 22% and a BS Rank of 12% (25,544 of 28,846 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 88.60% of the article peer group.

A long-rumored Trump administration plan to repurpose a private prison in rural western Minnesota for use as a detention center for undocumented immigrants has come to fruition. 
Prison industry giant CoreCivic announced Tuesday that it has finalized a five-year federal contract to reopen a long-shuttered prison in Appleton that will now hold immigrant detainees. 
The company estimated its new contract with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) would bring in $75 million a year. 
CoreCivic’s contract with ICE comes as little surprise. 
The company, which owns the facility in Appleton, has for many months been refurbishing the prison, called the Prairie Correctional Facility. 
Related: Appleton prison seeks job applicants amid renewed federal interest in facility for immigrant detentions 
The city of Appleton built the prison, but CoreCivic purchased it in 1997 to hold state prisoners, then shut it down in 2010 because of decreased demand. 
It was once the largest employer in the Swift County city . 
Now it will hold up to 1,600 immigrant detainees. 
Prairie Correctional Facility on Tuesday, Nov. 11, 2025, in Appleton, Minn. 
Credit: Ellen Schmidt/MinnPost/CatchLight Local/Report for America 
CoreCivic said it expects to begin receiving detainees at the end of this year “with the full ramp estimated to be complete in the second quarter of 2027.” 
Plans to repurpose buildings in Minnesota for immigrant detention  including proposals to use warehouses in the Twin Cities  has divided lawmakers and drawn criticism from activist groups. 
Rep. 
Michelle Fischbach, who represents the 7th Congressional District where Appleton is located, told MinnPost at Farmfest on Tuesday that she was happy to hear the prison was reopening. 
“I know that the community has been very supportive of making sure that we can open that up, and it makes sense,” she said. 
“There’s an existing facility there, and so there doesn’t have to be anything new built.” 
Her opponent, Democrat Erik Osberg , tied the prison announcement to last year’s “One Big Beautiful Bill,” saying he’s against the reopening and wants to repeal the legislation that enabled it. 
“There’s a $180 billion detention center and deportation-industrial complex in that legislation,” he said. 
“That’s what this is about, and guess who gets to build and run them? 
Private companies.” 
Reactions to the prison were split along party lines at the state level as well. 
State Sen. 
Torrey Westrom, R-Alexandria, stated the contract will bring jobs and economic opportunity to his district. 
He thanked Trump and Fischbach for making the prison reopening a reality. 
“This is a ‘Big Beautiful Building’ and a significant investment that should not have been left sitting vacant for so many years,” Westrom stated. 
“When this facility closed, it had a devastating economic impact on our region and residents. 
Bringing it back into service will create approximately 450 new jobs and provide a significant economic boost for Appleton and communities throughout West Central Minnesota.” 
The chair of the state’s Senate Judiciary and Public Safety Committee, Ron Latz, DFL-St. 
Louis Park, called the plans an affront to all Minnesotans. 
“The stories and reporting on the treatment of people detained by ICE are appalling, and raise serious concerns about the health and safety of the men, women, and children who are in these facilities,” he stated. 
“No one should be detained for profit and a corporation’s bottom line, which is why we banned the use of for-profit prisons in 2023 in Minnesota. 
Every effort will be explored as to how the state can prevent this facility from opening.” 
Ramped up deportations 
The reopening of the Prairie Correctional Facility is a part of the Trump administration’s quest to find more detention space as it continually presses to increase deportations. 
As the administration scaled up arrests and deportations in the president’s second term, CoreCivic positioned itself to be ready to reopen the prison. 
Last summer, the Washington Post reported the United States had reached capacity with about 50,000 immigrants under detention and that the Trump administration wanted to more than double that number to 107,00. 
Former President Joe Biden issued an executive order in his first days in the White House that directed the attorney general not to renew U.S. 
Justice Department contracts with privately operated criminal detention facilities. 
But Trump moved quickly after his inauguration to rescind that order. 
That dramatically changed the fortunes of companies like CoreCivic and the GEO Group and their stocks soared. 
CURE, a rural advocacy organization, said Appleton residents have been gathering regularly to oppose the facility. 
The public workers union AFSCME, meanwhile, condemned ICE’s decision to contract with a for-profit prison company. 
“”No corporation should generate revenue and profit off imprisoning human beings, separating families, and expanding a for-profit detention system that treats human beings and workers as sources of profit for shareholders,” the union stated in a release. 
Editor’s note: This story has been updated to add comments and background on the plan . 
The post It’s official: The dormant prison in rural Appleton will become an ICE detention center appeared first on MinnPost . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.4%Brian Arola: 1.7%MinnPost: 1.6%Confirmation Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 2.5%MinnPost: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Brian Arola: 1.4%MinnPost: 2.0%Availability Heuristic3.8%This article: 1.8%Brian Arola: 1.3%MinnPost: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic1.8%This article: 1.3%Brian Arola: 0.3%MinnPost: 0.4%Hindsight Bias1.3%This article: 3.9%Brian Arola: 1.1%MinnPost: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias3.9%This article: 12.5%Brian Arola: 7.4%MinnPost: 4.3%Framing Effect12.5%This article: 3.1%Brian Arola: 0.9%MinnPost: 0.7%Loss Aversion3.1%This article: 1.4%Brian Arola: 0.5%MinnPost: 0.6%Status Quo Bias1.4%This article: 3.2%Brian Arola: 0.2%MinnPost: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect3.2%This article: 5.1%Brian Arola: 0.5%MinnPost: 2.7%Optimism Bias5.1%This article: 3.2%Brian Arola: 2.9%MinnPost: 1.3%Pessimism Bias3.2%This article: 13.3%Brian Arola: 5.4%MinnPost: 4.9%Negativity Bias13.3%This article: 4.7%Brian Arola: 1.1%MinnPost: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias4.7%This article: 2.7%Brian Arola: 0.3%MinnPost: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error2.7%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.6%MinnPost: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Brian Arola: 1.7%MinnPost: 0.9%In-Group Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.3%MinnPost: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.2%MinnPost: 1.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.1%MinnPost: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.0%MinnPost: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.9%MinnPost: 0.7%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.2%MinnPost: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.3%MinnPost: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.3%MinnPost: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.2%Brian Arola: 0.0%MinnPost: 0.2%Straw Man0.2%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 4.6%MinnPost: 2.9%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 3.4%Brian Arola: 1.1%MinnPost: 1.2%False Dilemma3.4%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.0%MinnPost: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.4%MinnPost: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.6%Brian Arola: 3.0%MinnPost: 3.1%Hasty Generalization5.6%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.3%MinnPost: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.0%MinnPost: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.0%Brian Arola: 5.8%MinnPost: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion6.0%This article: 1.7%Brian Arola: 0.8%MinnPost: 0.4%Begging the Question1.7%This article: 9.2%Brian Arola: 3.4%MinnPost: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.2%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.0%MinnPost: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.2%MinnPost: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 3.1%Brian Arola: 0.0%MinnPost: 0.1%Appeal to Nature3.1%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.2%MinnPost: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.6%Brian Arola: 2.5%MinnPost: 1.7%Anecdotal8.6%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.0%MinnPost: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.8%Brian Arola: 2.2%MinnPost: 0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.8%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.0%MinnPost: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.5%MinnPost: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.0%MinnPost: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.0%MinnPost: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.1%MinnPost: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.4%MinnPost: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.8%MinnPost: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 1.8%MinnPost: 3.6%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 4.4%Brian Arola: 1.3%MinnPost: 1.5%Indoctrination4.4%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 1.5%MinnPost: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 0.3%MinnPost: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Brian Arola: 2.4%MinnPost: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

845 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers53%attributed speech393writer words
Selected voice

AFSCME

70%flagged-word coverage
53 attributed words12% of attributed speech62% writer coverage
0%35.0%70.0%Indoctrination+69.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%AFSCME: 69.8%69.8%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.