BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 153 hits. Analysis detected 976 faulty-reasoning hits from 740 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.8% and a BS Rank of 54% (11,965 of 26,004 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 54.00% of the article peer group.

UNITED NATIONS (AP)  U.N. human rights chief Volker Türk won a second term Friday despite opposition from the United States, Russia and Israel to keep him in one of the most controversial United Nations posts for four more years. 
U.N. member nations rejected a U.S. proposal to delay the vote until the end of next week as well as a Russian proposal to extend Türk’s term just until the end of the year. 
The vote in the 193-member General Assembly to reappoint Türk was 144-10, with 13 abstentions. 
While he got strong support, the votes and speeches also reflected concern that Secretary-General António Guterres quietly nominated the Austrian lawyer this month after private consultations, with no public discussion, as the U.N. chief nears the end of his own 10-year tenure. 
Türk’s job as the U.N. rights chief, by its nature, is tricky: It requires speaking out against rights violations by the governments of the countries that make up the membership of the world body. 
For instance, Türk has sharply criticized Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. 
Türk got wide support but loud pushback from the U.S. and Israel 
Türk, whose term was supposed to expire on Oct. 11, has faced opposition from critics and some countries for his criticism of Israel’s attacks in Gaza and his approach to China’s crackdown on its Uyghur minority. 
None of Türk’s predecessors have served two full terms since the job was created in 1993. 
U.S. deputy ambassador Jeff Bartos warned before the vote that reappointing Türk would prove that the General Assembly “is dysfunctional” and that the vote “was quietly shoved onto the agenda at the last minute to bypass meaningful review.” 
“The United States will immediately reassess our engagement, participation and funding,” he warned. 
The Trump administration already owes nearly $4 billion to the U.N. for its regular dues and for the separate budget for U.N. peacekeeping operations. 
Russia’s deputy ambassador, Dmitry Chumakov, said Guterres had sown discord among U.N. members and accused Türk of “political bias” and promoting “Western geopolitical interests under the pretext of concern for human rights.” 
“The European Union believes that Mr. 
Türk has demonstrably fulfilled responsibilities entrusted to him effectively and with integrity in an objective and non-selective manner over the past four years,” Mythen said. 
He takes on another term when “the multiplication of obstacles and challenges and rights violations is relentless, and the promotion and protection of all human rights becomes ever more contested.” 
Guterres, whose own second five-year term ends Dec. 31, sent letters to regional groups at the United Nations this month informing them of his intention to reappoint Türk. 
The African group had no objection, but the Latin American countries had several, including Nicaragua, Argentina and Paraguay. 
Before the vote, Israel’s Foreign Ministry called Guterres’ action to get a second term for Türk the U.N. secretary-general’s “latest moral failure,” saying on social media that the choice should be left to his successor. 
“After years of bias against Israel, the answer is accountability  not rewriting the rules,” the ministry said. 
Guterres is ‘following the rules’ on the reappointment, UN says 
U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric says Guterres was following the 1993 resolution that established a U.N. high commissioner for human rights and allows for a second term. 
“The secretary-general is doing things in a very transparent manner, following the rules and his authority,” Dujarric told reporters Friday. 
“Consultations were had with member states prior to this and with regional groups.” 
As human rights chief, the longtime U.N. functionary who worked for Guterres at United Nations headquarters in New York, Türk has expressed concerns on issues in China as diverse as the fate of detained individuals  like artist Gao Zhen, lawyer Yu Wensheng and media mogul Jimmy Lai  and counterterrorism and assimilation practices that affect ethnic minorities including the Uyghurs in the regions of Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia and Tibet. 
Critics insist he could have done more to publicly follow up on a report issued by his predecessor, former Chilean President Michelle Bachelet, that said China’s discriminatory detention of Uyghurs and other mostly Muslim ethnic groups in Xinjiang may amount to crimes against humanity. 
The Chinese government denies the Uyghurs have been or are being persecuted. 
It maintains its policies in Xinjiang rooted out terrorism and religious extremism after sporadic bouts of violence rocked the region in previous decades. 
___ 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.6%Edith M. Lederer: 1.8%AP News: 1.9%Confirmation Bias16.6%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.2%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 1.1%AP News: 2.5%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 2.2%Edith M. Lederer: 0.1%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic2.2%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.0%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 3.4%AP News: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%Edith M. Lederer: 2.7%AP News: 7.3%Framing Effect8.9%This article: 1.8%Edith M. Lederer: 0.1%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion1.8%This article: 1.4%Edith M. Lederer: 0.1%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias1.4%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.7%Edith M. Lederer: 0.6%AP News: 2.1%Optimism Bias2.7%This article: 4.1%Edith M. Lederer: 0.5%AP News: 1.9%Pessimism Bias4.1%This article: 20.7%Edith M. Lederer: 2.7%AP News: 8.8%Negativity Bias20.7%This article: 7.4%Edith M. Lederer: 1.4%AP News: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias7.4%This article: 4.7%Edith M. Lederer: 0.6%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error4.7%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.4%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 1.2%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Edith M. Lederer: 0.5%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.4%This article: 3.4%Edith M. Lederer: 0.7%AP News: 1.3%Halo Effect3.4%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.0%AP News: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.3%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 14.2%Edith M. Lederer: 3.6%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem14.2%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.6%Edith M. Lederer: 1.3%AP News: 3.3%Appeal to Authority9.6%This article: 2.4%Edith M. Lederer: 0.3%AP News: 1.1%False Dilemma2.4%This article: 4.1%Edith M. Lederer: 0.2%AP News: 0.7%Slippery Slope4.1%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 1.1%AP News: 2.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.3%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.7%Edith M. Lederer: 1.8%AP News: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion4.7%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.1%AP News: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.3%AP News: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.5%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.1%Edith M. Lederer: 0.2%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof5.1%This article: 3.1%Edith M. Lederer: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature3.1%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.9%Edith M. Lederer: 0.4%AP News: 1.1%Anecdotal5.9%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.0%AP News: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.2%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.8%Edith M. Lederer: 0.3%AP News: 1.9%Unattributed Quote0.8%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.6%AP News: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 5.7%Edith M. Lederer: 1.2%AP News: 2.8%Biased Writer Voice5.7%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.3%AP News: 0.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.0%AP News: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Edith M. Lederer: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

740 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers22%attributed speech580writer words
Selected voice

Dmitry Chumakov

100%flagged-word coverage
32 attributed words20% of attributed speech54% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-7.2 ptsWriter: 7.2%Dmitry Chumakov: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-1.0 ptsWriter: 1.0%Dmitry Chumakov: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.