Keyword summary
81% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,841 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Israel-Hamas War results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 2,476 hits . Analysis detected 17,727 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,544 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (31,869 of 37,536 keywords). This Israel-Hamas War is better (less manipulative) than 84.90% of the peer group. Israel-Hamas War
Keyword details
Total words: 20,544
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score8 analyzed articles20.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.4% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst