Keyword summary
76%1 analyzed article/video740 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dmitry Chumakov results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 303 hits. Analysis detected 2,272 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,960 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 60% (20,765 of 51,050 keywords). This Dmitry Chumakov is worse (more manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Dmitry Chumakov
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
60%Dmitry Chumakov (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,960
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

59% percentile
025507510059.3% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.7%8.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos