BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Overconfidence Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 816 faulty-reasoning hits from 747 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 51.5% and a BS Rank of 65% (10,104 of 28,112 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 64.10% of the article peer group.

Water rationing is about to begin in Arizona, Nevada and California. 
The Washington Post reports the states  will be required to curb their use of the water from the Colorado River by a combined 20 percent over the next two years  and could ultimately face even larger cuts.” 
The combination of water shortages and scorching temperatures  today’s forecast for Phoenix is for a high of 112  will have long-term implications for Buffalo and other cities on the Great Lakes. 
We’ve got plenty of fresh water and temperate weather. 
In due time, places like Buffalo, Cleveland and the like will become destinations for climate refugees. 
In the meantime, the challenge for Great Lakes cities is to get their act together. 
In Western New York’s case, that starts with cleaning up our government and environment. 
It’s not too early to start planning for that future. 
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. 
A story in City and State New York asks the question: Should our state Legislature meet year round ? 
Lawmakers meet in session from January through June. 
At $142,000, they’re the highest paid state legislators in the nation and supported by large staffs. 
There’s a case to be made that they ought to be in session for at least part of the second half of the year, but that’s not the most-significant reform to be had. 
That would be reinvigorating the legislative process, which presently puts too much control in the hands of the leadership of the Senate and Assembly, who in turn negotiate with the governor. 
(AKA, three men in a room.) 
The state budget and many key policies are then presented  take it or leave it  to the rank and file at the 11th hour of the legislative process. 
Trump’s war against Iran is good for business at Moog, which reported a big increase in profits in its latest quarter . 
Contributing to the increase is a push to replenish the military’s stockpile of missiles, for which Moog produces guidance systems. 
The war is also good for the big oil companies, which are reporting a huge increase in profits . 
Exxon’s quarterly profits more than doubled from the previous year to $14.5 billion. 
Chevron’s quadrupled to $12.1 billion. 
A new study has determined that economic development subsidies do, indeed, lead to job creation. 
For lobbyists . 
Donate to support our nonprofit newsroom 
Ken Kruly reflects on the legacy of Robert F. 
Kennedy  the father, not the son. 
I consider RFK’s assination one of the great tragedies of my lifetime. 
I think we’d be living in a much different country if he had lived to be president. 
The trend to electronic vehicles is unmistakable and probably inevitable. 
So why is Detroit retreating in favor of gas guzzling trucks and SUVs ? 
File this under “Let Them Eat Cake.” 
Trump has ordered 250 Cadillac Escalades for his presidential motorcade , declaring:  We look sharp in those Escalades.” 
At the same time, his administration has announced the elimination of subsidies for Medicare Part D  the government health insurance program’s prescription drug benefit  that will drive up costs for tens of millions of beneficiaries. 
In short, he wants to spend on bombs and Cadillacs, not prescription drugs. 
Ah, but it’s not just old people he’s gunning for. 
His administration is also going after Head Start . 
File this under “presidential pettiness on display:” 
Trump overruled his own agencies to deny disaster relief to four blue states and his administration withheld clean energy grants to states that voted for Kamala Harris in the last presidential election. 
The”drill, baby, drill” president is refusing to release $7 billion in transit funding approved by Congress. 
It’s not as though he’s ignored public transit. 
He reportedly wants Penn Station in New York City renamed after himself . 
Trump is trying to strangle Cuba into submission. 
Cubans are responding with resourcefulness and hanging tough , as difficult as it is. 
Reports The New York Times: 
They are swapping their gas-guzzling 1950s American cars for electric motorcycles and rickshaws from China; importing hefty lithium batteries to keep televisions and fans running through blackouts; jury-rigging generators to run on more accessible natural gas; and installing solar panels on rooftops and even vehicles. 
Here’s your Doonesbury offering for the week . 
And now, what you’ve all been waiting for: a short featuring the Three Stooges . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 3.6%Investigative Post: 3.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 1.3%Investigative Post: 0.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 3.3%Investigative Post: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.6%Investigative Post: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 2.3%Jim Heaney: 0.9%Investigative Post: 0.4%Hindsight Bias2.3%This article: 9.0%Jim Heaney: 1.5%Investigative Post: 0.5%Overconfidence Bias9.0%This article: 8.3%Jim Heaney: 7.9%Investigative Post: 3.5%Framing Effect8.3%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.6%Investigative Post: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.0%Investigative Post: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.0%Investigative Post: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.6%Jim Heaney: 1.1%Investigative Post: 1.4%Optimism Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 3.2%Investigative Post: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Jim Heaney: 14.8%Investigative Post: 10.2%Negativity Bias6.8%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.4%Investigative Post: 0.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 1.6%Investigative Post: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.0%Investigative Post: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Jim Heaney: 1.7%Investigative Post: 0.5%In-Group Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.3%Investigative Post: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.1%Investigative Post: 0.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.0%Investigative Post: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.0%Investigative Post: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.2%Investigative Post: 0.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.0%Investigative Post: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.0%Investigative Post: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.8%Jim Heaney: 2.6%Investigative Post: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.8%This article: 1.7%Jim Heaney: 0.7%Investigative Post: 0.1%Straw Man1.7%This article: 2.0%Jim Heaney: 1.7%Investigative Post: 2.0%Appeal to Authority2.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 1.3%Investigative Post: 0.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.4%Investigative Post: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.2%Investigative Post: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.8%Jim Heaney: 5.5%Investigative Post: 2.9%Hasty Generalization7.8%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.9%Investigative Post: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 1.3%Investigative Post: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 12.6%Jim Heaney: 2.9%Investigative Post: 2.7%Appeal to Emotion12.6%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.7%Investigative Post: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.5%Jim Heaney: 2.9%Investigative Post: 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.5%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.1%Investigative Post: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.6%Investigative Post: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.7%Investigative Post: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.3%Investigative Post: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 2.6%Investigative Post: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.9%Investigative Post: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.6%Investigative Post: 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.0%Investigative Post: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.0%Investigative Post: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.2%Investigative Post: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.3%Investigative Post: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.9%Investigative Post: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 3.8%Investigative Post: 0.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.5%Investigative Post: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 18.1%Jim Heaney: 13.1%Investigative Post: 2.8%Biased Writer Voice18.1%This article: 5.2%Jim Heaney: 1.6%Investigative Post: 0.4%Indoctrination5.2%This article: 20.9%Jim Heaney: 5.8%Investigative Post: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias20.9%This article: 0.0%Jim Heaney: 0.2%Investigative Post: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.8%Jim Heaney: 0.9%Investigative Post: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.8%

747 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers19%attributed speech604writer words
Selected voice

The New York Times

0%flagged-word coverage
50 attributed words35% of attributed speech73% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Politically Left Leaning B-25.8 ptsWriter: 25.8%The New York Times: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-22.4 ptsWriter: 22.4%The New York Times: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-6.5 ptsWriter: 6.5%The New York Times: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.0 ptsWriter: 1.0%The New York Times: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.