Keyword summary
82%1 analyzed article/video747 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Development Subsidies results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 532 hits. Analysis detected 2,618 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 59% (23,101 of 55,220 keywords). This Economic Development Subsidies is worse (more manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group.
Economic Development Subsidies
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
59%Economic Development Subsidies (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,988
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

58% percentile
025507510058.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 17.8%17.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 5.2%5.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos