Topic summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video409 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zoological Parks results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Halo Effect, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 127 hits. Analysis detected 979 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,227 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,112 of 16,562 topics). This Zoological Parks is worse (more manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group.
Zoological Parks
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,227
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510069.1% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 9.4%9.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos