Topic summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video865 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Youtube Blunder results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 316 hits. Analysis detected 2,418 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,595 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,173 of 16,562 topics). This Youtube Blunder is worse (more manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Youtube Blunder
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,595
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510050.7% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.0%12.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.1%4.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.2%12.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos