Topic summary
⁠22%2 analyzed articles/videos4,919 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Youth Soccer results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Indoctrination, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 1,277 hits. Analysis detected 10,868 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,356 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (14,508 of 15,769 topics). This Youth Soccer is better (less manipulative) than 92.00% of the peer group.
Youth Soccer
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 16,356
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

8% percentile
02550751008.0% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles16.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos