Author summary
ā 87% 1 analyzed article/video 3,320 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evan McGarvey results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Indoctrination , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 1,191 hits . Analysis detected 9,211 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,960 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ā 44% (3,744 of 6,628 authors). This Evan McGarvey is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group. Evan McGarvey
Author details
Total words: 9,960
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles10K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.7% 6.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 12.0% 12.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.7% 6.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 12.0%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Horn Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst