Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video941 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Your Money results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 36.3% saturation with 1,025 hits. Analysis detected 4,652 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,822 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,783 of 16,562 topics). This Your Money is worse (more manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group.
Your Money
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,822
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510089.2% percentile
8.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 36.3%36.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 14.8%14.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 28.5%28.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.9%17.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.3%5.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 7.1%7.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Topic 36.3%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 28.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos