Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 941 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vito Emanuel results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Loss Aversion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 36.3% saturation with 1,025 hits . Analysis detected 4,652 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,822 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of 93% (488 of 6,628 authors). This Vito Emanuel is worse (more manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group. Vito Emanuel
Author details
Total words: 2,822
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.7% percentile 8.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 36.3% 36.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 14.8% 14.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 11.4% 11.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 28.5% 28.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.9% 17.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 5.3% 5.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 7.1% 7.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Author 36.3%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Author 28.5%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 17.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Loss Aversion: Author 14.8%, sitewide 2.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 11.5%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 1.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 4.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Bandwagon: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst