Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video941 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Your Life Kit For Better Personal Finance results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 36.3% saturation with 1,025 hits. Analysis detected 4,652 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,822 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,782 of 16,562 topics). This Your Life Kit For Better Personal Finance is worse (more manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group.
Your Life Kit For Better Personal Finance
Topic details
Total words: 2,822
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510089.2% percentile
8.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 36.3%36.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 14.8%14.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 28.5%28.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.9%17.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.3%5.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 7.1%7.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Topic 36.3%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 28.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos