Topic summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video2,054 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Young Politicians results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 959 hits. Analysis detected 6,669 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,231 of 16,562 topics). This Young Politicians is better (less manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group.
Young Politicians
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠45%Young Politicians (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 8,216
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510044.3% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.6%11.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos