Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video834 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yonkers results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 195 hits. Analysis detected 1,812 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,336 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (13,079 of 16,562 topics). This Yonkers is better (less manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Yonkers
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,336
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510021.0% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos