Topic summary
⁠94%3 analyzed articles/videos1,817 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yemen Conflict results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 1,436 hits. Analysis detected 11,041 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,381 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,026 of 16,562 topics). This Yemen Conflict is worse (more manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group.
Yemen Conflict
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,381
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.7% percentile
4.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.8%13.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.0%14.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.5%22.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.4%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos