Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video383 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yellowstone Spinoff results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 49.7% saturation with 571 hits. Analysis detected 2,252 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,149 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,214 of 15,781 topics). This Yellowstone Spinoff is worse (more manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group.
Yellowstone Spinoff
Topic details
Total words: 1,149
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

92% percentile
025507510092.3% percentile
10.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 49.7%49.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 38.6%38.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.5%9.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.1%7.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.4%6.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 49.7%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 38.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.4%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos