Author summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,896 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Hookstead results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and In-Group Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 1,780 hits . Analysis detected 19,418 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,589 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,262 of 6,134 authors). This David Hookstead is worse (more manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group. David Hookstead
Author details
Total words: 8,589
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.4% percentile 4.5% BS Score7 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 20.7% 20.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.1% 17.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 12.7% 12.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.4% 11.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 13.3% 13.3% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.2% 6.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 8.0% 8.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.9% 12.9% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 17.1%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.7%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 17.8%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.9%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 5.9%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst