Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,402 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Year Of Global Elections results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 926 hits. Analysis detected 6,327 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,295 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (7,961 of 16,562 topics). This Year Of Global Elections is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Year Of Global Elections
Topic details
Total words: 5,295
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.9% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 17.5%17.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.5%13.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos