Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,565 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Xenophobia results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 1,574 hits. Analysis detected 7,875 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,338 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,448 of 15,763 topics). This Xenophobia is better (less manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Xenophobia
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,338
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510046.4% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.4%21.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos