Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Wwdc26 results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 1,166 hits . Analysis detected 6,198 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,384 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,988 topics). This Wwdc26 is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Wwdc26
Topic details
Total words: 13,384
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 0.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst