Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These World Trade Center results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Indoctrination, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.1% saturation with 587 hits. Analysis detected 2,255 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,827 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This World Trade Center is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
World Trade Center
Topic details
Total words: 1,827
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 32.1%32.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.2%9.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.7%12.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 4.9%4.9%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 32.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos