Topic summary
⁠7%1 analyzed article/video1,025 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Series Celebration results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 229 hits. Analysis detected 1,158 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,075 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (14,954 of 16,562 topics). This World Series Celebration is better (less manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group.
World Series Celebration
Topic details
Total words: 3,075
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

10% percentile
02550751009.7% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.7%2.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos