Topic summary
0% 15 analyzed articles/videos 1,285 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Series results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Halo Effect , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 75.3% saturation with 2,904 hits . Analysis detected 15,581 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,855 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.6% and a BS Rank of 96% (786 of 16,562 topics). This World Series is worse (more manipulative) than 95.30% of the peer group. World Series
Topic details
Total words: 3,855
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.3% percentile 12.6% BS Score15 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 75.3% 75.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 55.5% 55.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 38.9% 38.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 34.2% 34.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 36.8% 36.8% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 29.8% 29.8% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 28.3% 28.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 20.0% 20.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 21.6% 21.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Framing Effect: Topic 75.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 55.5%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Topic 38.9%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 36.8%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 34.2%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Topic 29.8%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 28.3%, sitewide 2.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% No True Scotsman: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst