Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 88 analyzed words
BS Summary: These HIGHLANDMINT results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Loss Aversion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 95.5% saturation with 252 hits . Analysis detected 1,104 faulty-reasoning hits from 264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.1% and a BS Rank of 100% (33 of 6,244 authors). This HIGHLANDMINT is worse (more manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group. HIGHLANDMINT
Author details
Total words: 264
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
100% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 99.5% percentile 26.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles264 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–125%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 95.5% 95.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 65.2% 65.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 61.4% 61.4% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 42.0% 42.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 35.6% 35.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 31.8% 31.8% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 21.6% 21.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 23.1% 23.1% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 10.2% 10.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.2% 10.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% 120% 120% Framing Effect: Author 95.5%, sitewide 26.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 65.2%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 61.4%, sitewide 15.9% Loss Aversion: Author 42.0%, sitewide 2.5% Halo Effect: Author 35.6%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 31.8%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Author 23.1%, sitewide 6.9% Bandwagon: Author 21.6%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 6.0% Primacy Effect: Author 10.2%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Nature: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst