Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video900 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Junior Championship results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 43.8% saturation with 1,183 hits. Analysis detected 4,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,700 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,390 of 15,335 topics). This World Junior Championship is worse (more manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group.
World Junior Championship
Topic details
Total words: 2,700
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510084.4% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 43.8%43.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 15.4%15.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 21.1%21.1%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%In-Group Bias: Topic 43.8%, sitewide 6.9%Framing Effect: Topic 30.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Bandwagon: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Gambler’s Fallacy: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos