Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These World Cup Controversies results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 468 hits. Analysis detected 3,663 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,769 topics). This World Cup Controversies is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
World Cup Controversies
Topic details
Total words: 4,168
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 10.1%10.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.2%11.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.3%10.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos