Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video588 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Baseball Classic results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 33.4% saturation with 590 hits. Analysis detected 2,884 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,764 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (3,665 of 16,562 topics). This World Baseball Classic is worse (more manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group.
World Baseball Classic
Topic details
Total words: 1,764
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

78% percentile
025507510077.9% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 33.5%33.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.9%17.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 11.4%11.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.7%13.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%In-Group Bias: Topic 33.5%, sitewide 6.9%Framing Effect: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Horn Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.0%Red Herring: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.6%Special Pleading: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos