Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 817 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Workplace Issues results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Self-Serving Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 684 hits . Analysis detected 5,789 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,404 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 29% (11,856 of 16,562 topics). This Workplace Issues is better (less manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group. Workplace Issues
Topic details
Total words: 6,404
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.7% 10.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst