Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos817 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Workplace Issues results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Self-Serving Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 684 hits. Analysis detected 5,789 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,404 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 29% (11,856 of 16,562 topics). This Workplace Issues is better (less manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Workplace Issues
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,404
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510028.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.4%10.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate